New Property of Water Discovered

December 1, 2016

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers have discovered that when in carbon nanotubes, which are just a few molecules thick, water freezes, even at temperatures in excess of 105 degrees Celsius –beyond its usual boiling point. The discovery may lead to subsequent applications with the transportation of protons given that water is 10 times better at doing so than standard conductors.

Hate & Trade

November 20, 2016

great-seal

 

 

 

The U.S. 2016 presidential election laid bare the abysmal rift mocking our cherished Latin motto, e pluribus unum –from many, one. Xenophobia and hatred, its conjoined twin, long dormant, have unabashedly reemerged to threaten anew the very fabric of our nation. This is not a reenactment of the Civil War, fought largely by and between what we call “whites.” For better or worse, the United States today is far more multi-racial and multi-ethnic, and the ongoing demographic change is sure to increase both the diversity and animosity.

There’s no denying that regardless of party affiliation, most Americans are sick and tired of how the wealth in this country is being distributed. Proof of that is that Trump and Sanders responded –from vastly different points of view- to the widespread anger and frustration. But Trump’s victory is fraught with risk and uncertainty, for he lost the popular vote.

This is not a rush to judgment on what Trump will or won’t actually do when he takes office. World leaders meeting in Lima, Peru have already done that. Instead, we seek to put the entire truth on the table –yet again- to suggest a feasible, realistic solution to the predicament we all face. Climate change threatens everyone without exception, even deniers.

There are certain fundamental facts driving the world’s economy. Among them that manufacturers of everyday consumer goods cannot pay American workers the bygone high wages of the 50’s and 60’s and simultaneously hope to compete in the global economy. More specifically, the Asian model of low wages backed by a vast pool of potential customers has effectively crushed the once tenuous relationship between American big money and labor; and it’s going to get worse to the extent that China and India continue to expand the scope and quality of their manufacturing base. Eventually they’ll make and undersell anything and everything we make, from world class automobiles to wide body passenger jets.

The numbers speak for themselves. In the U.S., roughly 20% of students are enrolled in STEM (science, technology and math) majors. In China, with a population four times as large, that figure exceeds 40%, and climbing. Evidently research and development are not going to save us. Neither will erecting tariffs nor walking away from existing trade agreements. That might spiral into full blown trade wars that would preclude us from exporting anything to most of the world’s customers. They wouldn’t lose. We would.

2015-world-gdp-ppp

Never mind trying to dominate the world; that’s a thing of the past, a temporary byproduct of World War II, an event that cannot be reenacted. Instead, our goals should be to avoid national bankruptcy and to maintain economic relevance. And the way to do so is to redress our chronic trade deficit by manufacturing that which both China and India desperately need but cannot efficiently produce: hydrogen, the only element which, when combined with oxygen in the atmosphere, produces pure water and energy. It’s not that they don’t know how to do it. It’s that they lack the necessary geographical and topographical attributes. Specifically, China doesn’t have a western ocean bordering the Gobi Desert, and India lacks a vast natural depression below sea level, akin to Death Valley, near its coasts. The U.S. has both plus a sparsely populated western half waiting to be transformed into a vast economic engine with jobs that cannot be outsourced or relocated.

The mass production of hydrogen by electrolysis of seawater powered by solar energy and gravity would effectively end the era of fossil fuels and electric utilities –obsolete monopolies. That would simultaneously stop the emissions of carbon dioxide flowing into the atmosphere and conquer drought, even in the driest desert. More importantly, the raw materials –the ocean, the sun, and gravity- cannot be hoarded. They’re virtually unlimited, free, and except for landlocked countries, universally available. As a result, it is possible to redistribute the profits to homeowners in an egalitarian manner. After all, it is they who would generate the solar energy to power the enterprise. In sum, it’s up to the voters; in a true democracy they have the ultimate say.

Saving the Dollar and Preserving Life

October 8, 2016

“… of the three powers –the power of armies, of alliances, and of money- the third is perhaps the most dependable weapon. Such accumulation of treasure is regarded by other states as a threat of war, and if it were not for the difficulties in learning the amount, it would force the other state to make an early attack.”

-Immanuel Kant, Perpetual Peace, 1795

 

It’s no secret that the United States –saddled with chronic trade and federal deficits- has lost its “surplus” status, and that following its unilateral termination of the Bretton-Woods system on August 15, 1971, the dollar is presently neither convertible to gold nor backed by America’s much reduced output of consumer goods. However, global demand for the greenback remains strong, for two reasons. One is that oil –a principal member of the troika of fossil fuels causing global warming- is billed in dollars and cleared through US banks. Since most nations are net oil importers, they need dollars to pay for it. The other is that, with a few notable exceptions, the world has all but outsourced security to the U.S. In this sense for example, NATO members, most of which are in the Eurozone and/or the European Union, themselves deficit countries except for Germany, are not faced with the onerous expense of maintaining what amounts to a permanent state of mobilization for war; instead, the U.S., which never really demobilized its Navy and Air Force after World War II, in effect does that for them. The drawback to this scheme is that to be of any value, these countries must be convinced that they face a chronic real and present danger to their existence. However, when the Soviet Union collapsed, NATO did not dissolve; it simply expanded east to absorb some former Warsaw Pact countries, a course of action guaranteed to provoke an eventual reaction from Russia, who views this as the biggest existential threat it’s ever faced. This reaction is now billed as the threat that justifies NATO’s existence, and by extension, the incalculable value of America’s permanent role as Europe’s protector. A similar relationship exists with the western rim of the Persian Gulf and with Southeast Asia, tectonic areas colliding with vital Chinese and Russian interests. As a result, what we have at the moment is a system of alliances and “understandings,” an immense powder keg reminiscent of the period just before World War I. All it needs is a spark, and it will go off –with nuclear weapons.

 

Only the Federal Reserve has the authority to create dollars from thin air; all others must earn the dollars they use to buy oil with. That unique advantage allows the U.S. government to borrow with abandon ad infinitum, to impose financial sanctions on others, and to live beyond its means. Were the dollar to lose this privilege, the government’s credit rating would instantly be severely degraded, its borrowing costs would skyrocket, and deficit spending would come to a screeching halt. The value of the greenback would collapse, inflation would explode, the steepest depression ever would follow, and the elite would lose most, if not all, of their accumulated wealth. In addition, the defense budget –currently almost as large as the rest of the world combined- as well as the entitlements on which many retirees, the disabled and others depend on for dear life would have to be severely curtailed –perhaps even eliminated. Riots and Marshal Law would surely follow, and even that might not be enough to restore order.

 

Externally, since so many nations have invested so much in dollar denominated assets, particularly China, Japan, Germany and the (still) United Kingdom, a sudden collapse of America’s ability to buy foreign products and services would trigger a global disaster of such magnitude that no single nation or even a group of nations would be able to contain. Like molten lava, it would overwhelm everything in its path. However, just because the entire world has a vested interest in preventing the dollar’s sudden collapse doesn’t mean everyone is happy with the existing order. Many, including within the U.S. itself and allied nations, grumble that it is rigged to benefit the few at the expense of the many, both between and within nations, and are itching to replace it with something more egalitarian and just. So far, however, no one has offered a viable, concrete and practical blueprint to do so.

 

Fearing an end to their ability to spend at will, influential strategic planners are doing everything in their power to perpetuate the dollar’s privileged role as the world’s reserve currency. But it is a futile effort, for the system is now archaic and obsolete. The undeniable reality of climate change means that humanity must either stop using fossil fuels and nuclear energy (Fukushima, Chernobyl and our inability to neutralize nuclear waste are stark reminders of fission’s inherent dangers) altogether or face the all too real possibility of extinction. Either way, the end of the dollar’s relationship with oil is a matter of when, not if.

 

It’s not enough to aim for a reduction of carbon emissions. As long as the world continues to use fossil fuels, emissions will continue to climb because the growing middle class in China, India, Africa and elsewhere will consume more. Clearly then, the only way to prevent further accumulation of anthropomorphic greenhouse gases is to stop using fossil fuels altogether, even if it’s anathema to the dollar’s needs. Accordingly, the powers that be must switch gears, now, while there’s time, to invest in -and create- a new financial system based on hydrogen, not oil. For example, a formula could be devised to establish exchange rates among all currencies pegged to their respective countries’ production of hydrogen, population, and gross national product. That would level the playing field by –in effect- giving everyone, not just the U.S., the ability to print convertible currency to encourage competition (an essential element of capitalism), expand equitable trade –and  promote a lasting peace.

 

Why hydrogen? Firstly because it’s virtually inexhaustible (there’s enough of it for everyone) recyclable, and readily available; secondly, because it’s the only element with the unique ability to manufacture water with the oxygen in the air –anywhere, even in the middle of the driest deserts- the only sure way to mitigate the effects of coming megadroughts throughout the world; thirdly, because it is the only energy carrier (not a fuel) that does not pollute the environment; fourthly, because it can make oil wars obsolete and unnecessary; and last but not least, because it can create a new, permanent income stream for ordinary people everywhere and anywhere to reduce the abysmal gap in the distribution of wealth and income, one of the biggest causes of terrorism and wars.

Decades-Long Megadroughts Coming

October 7, 2016

megadrought-small-usaA megadrought is comparable in severity to the worst droughts of the 20th century, but of much longer duration. As a result, it would impose unprecedented stress on limited water resources in the American Southwest. A study published in Science Advances warns of the near certainty of decades-long megadroughts in the area –70, 90, or 99% by the end of the century, even if precipitation increases moderately.

Scientists are doing their share and then some, warning us repeatedly of what’s ahead. The technology –aquafacture– to conquer drought permanently using only seawater, solar energy and gravity already exists. It is economically feasible and self-sustaining –doing nothing is far more expensive- and unlike desalination, which requires proximity to a shore, aquafacture can take place in the middle of any landmass, including arid regions such as the American Southwest, the Sahara, and western China. Better yet, it can potentially mitigate the devastating effect of rising oceans by flooding natural below-sea-level depressions worldwide. The question is, are our elected representatives willing and able to do what it takes to make it a reality? The alternative –inaction- risks extinction of our species.

 

Farm in Desert Uses Saltwater and Sun Only

October 6, 2016

A farm in Australia is now using seawater and sun to grow vegetables, and it does not require pesticides or fossil fuels. Instead, it relies on a sun-powered desalination plant and a greenhouse to irrigate tomatoes. This is of course a great step forward along the lines of Plan A, however it is impossible, or at best impractical, to attempt to recreate the system far from the ocean. The cost of pumping water hundreds or thousands of miles inland would be prohibitive; in addition, it does not generate a surplus of electricity as Plan A would.

0 Emissions Costa Rica

September 9, 2016

costa-rica-flagBackground

Since 1847, when Costa Rica declared sovereignty from the United Provinces of Central America, it has remained among the most stable, prosperous, and progressive nations in Latin America. In 1949 it became (and remains) one of sixteen sovereign nations without a standing army.

Achievements

  • It has been cited by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) as having a better record on human development and inequality than the median of the region.
  • Its rapidly developing economy has diversified to include sectors such as finance, pharmaceuticals, and ecotourism.
  • It is the only country to meet all five UNDP criteria established to measure environmental sustainability.
  • It ranked third in the Americas in the 2016 Environmental Performance Index.
  • It was twice ranked the best performing country in New Economics Foundation’s (NEF) Happy Planet Index and identified as the greenest country in the world in 2009.
  • According to UNDP in 2010 the life expectancy at birth for Costa Ricans was 79.3 years, second highest in the Americas and higher than the United States.
  • Its healthcare system is ranked higher than that of the United States, despite its incomparably smaller GDP.
  • Since 1941 it has provided universal health care to its wage-earning residents. By the year 2000, social health insurance coverage was available to 82% of the population. Notably (take note, U.S. Congress and presidential candidates), the government funds over 70% of it at a cost of about 7% of GDP.

Exemplary Again

Now the country has been powered entirely by a mix of hydroelectric (80.27%), geothermal (12.6%), wind (7.1%), and solar energy (0.01 %, there’s room for growth) for 76 days straight, from June 16, 2016 through September 2, and it’s not a fluke. In 2015 Costa Rica spent 299 days using renewable energy alone, and it’s going to get better. Later this month the Costa Rican Electricity Institute (ICE, in Spanish) will unveil the largest public infrastructure project in Central America after the Panama Canal, enough to power around 525,000 homes, Mashable reported.

The Obvious

If enlightened Costa Rica can achieve so much with so little for so many, certainly the rest of the world can too. For that however, humans will have to redefine “great” not on a country’s ability to destroy the planet but on its contributions to making life better for all, while we have one.

The Winds of Terminal War

September 8, 2016

The irresistible force and the immovable object.

The immovable object and the irresistible force.

Lately, focused on the impending presidential election, Syria, the Ukraine and the South China Sea, American mainstream media have all but ignored climate change. It’s as if there’s a consensus that war will inevitably transform Earth into another Mars long before it broils into another Venus. Why bother –that logic suggests- making, let alone implementing extraordinarily costly plans for the benefit of future generations that may never be born?

Leaders claim their highest priority and responsibility is the protection of their people. However, if that mentality is extended to a military confrontation between the world’s biggest nuclear powers, the U.S., Russia, and increasingly, China, they will be doing the very opposite. Even a small number of their highly efficient nuclear arsenals will trigger a nuclear winter. In a matter of days the upper atmosphere would be engulfed in a thick layer of radioactive dust that would block the sun’s rays from reaching the Earth’s surface. Without them, the entire planet would quickly freeze and all plants and animals, including us, would die.

This time weapons cannot and will not succeed in imposing one belligerent’s will on the other. Accordingly, our species needs to mature to a level commensurate with the rapidly increasing power of its technology. Furthermore, the ruling elites, who indirectly control all those planet-killer weapons, need to understand that climate change has doomed the plutocratic world order they are so desperately trying to perpetuate. Either we follow it into oblivion or we save ourselves by quickly adopting, as a preliminary step, true Aristotelian democracy –the rule of the majority, who happen to be the poor- worldwide. The status quo will not get us there.

 

Solar Cell Triggered by Sun and Rain

April 11,2016

A study published in Angewandte Chemie has found that when combined with an electron-enriched graphene electrode, a dye-sensitized solar cell can be excited by incident light on sunny days and raindrops on rainy days. Its optimal solar-to-electric conversion efficiency is 6.53%.

WordPress theme: Kippis 1.15
Translate »